In the quest to create a fairer and more equitable society, New York City has become a battleground where the ideals of modern progressivism have clashed with the stark realities of urban governance.

The once-glimmering metropolis, a beacon of progressivism under leaders like Theodore Roosevelt and Al Smith, now grapples with the unintended consequences of policies that have strayed from practical governance to wishful utopianism.

A century ago, the progressive movement ushered in an era of transformative change, mitigating the harsh impacts of urban migration and industrialization.

Progressive leaders fought corruption, championed the rule of law, and enacted civil regulations to protect individuals.

Landmark events like the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire led to strict safety standards, and the 1916 zoning code was introduced to ensure access to air and light amidst the rise of skyscrapers.

This pragmatic approach to progressivism was underscored by a commitment to law enforcement and a well-regulated capitalism that allowed New Yorkers to thrive.

Fast forward to modern New York, and the progressive banner has been commandeered by figures who have deviated significantly from their predecessors’ blueprint.

Efforts to enact social justice have led to lax criminal justice policies that have seen crime rates spike alarmingly.

The abolition of cash bail for nonviolent crimes, reduced enforcement of petty crimes, and the decriminalization of certain misdemeanors have led to a surge in lawlessness on the streets.

Homicides, shootings, and subway violence have all seen dramatic increases, leaving residents feeling more endangered than ever before.

Legislative measures such as the legalization of marijuana and e-bikes have also backfired, contributing to a new set of hazards, including unregulated pot sales and deadly e-bike battery fires.

These outcomes starkly contrast with the protective regulations once championed by early progressives. The lack of effective oversight and implementation has resulted in a regulatory vacuum filled by unregulated vendors and unsafe practices.

Economic policies, too, have failed to deliver on their promises. Despite raising taxes, which New Yorkers have historically tolerated for improved services and quality of life, the city now faces higher taxes paired with declining living standards—a situation not seen since the 1960s. This has led to an exodus of wealthy taxpayers and a lag in job recovery, putting a strain on the city’s economic vitality.

Critically, modern progressives have neglected the rigorous governance and follow-through needed to ensure that new laws yield positive outcomes. The original movement understood that passing a law was merely the first step, requiring diligent oversight and enforcement to translate legislative intent into real-world success. This disconnect between ideology and practical governance has left many New Yorkers disillusioned with the direction of their city, as they perceive a degradation in their quality of life.

Despite these challenges, the political landscape has been slow to adjust. The progressive caucus’s majority in the city council has waned, and some Democrats have distanced themselves from the more radical policies that have proven unpopular with the public. However, the robust debate and electoral challenges needed to recalibrate the city’s trajectory are hampered by the national political climate, which often overshadows local concerns.

Relevant articles:
– New study examines attitudes towards rape and homicide across political divides, PsyPost
– Gender Inequality Research Articles, R Discovery
– Regressives, City Journal