Russia’s once-vaunted military prowess, long regarded as an indomitable force on the global stage, finds itself increasingly challenged by Ukraine’s strategic finesse and bolstered by Western military support.

Despite Moscow’s efforts to flood the Donbas region with troops, Ukraine has not only maintained its defensive position but also underscored the enduring efficacy of tactical deception against a technologically superior foe.

The narrative of Russian military supremacy began to unravel notably with the annexation of Crimea. Despite initially facing professional soldiers equipped with advanced gear and weaponry, Ukraine has managed to hold its ground, showcasing the potency of strategic deception against an ostensibly overwhelming adversary.

Yet beneath the gleaming surface of “little green men” and modern armaments lies a reality check: Russia’s military might is as much about perception as tangible strength.

The Kremlin’s desire to project power has led to a bifurcated military—a modernized elite and a mass-mobilized remainder. The elite, well-equipped and capable of swift, precise operations, stands in stark contrast to the rest of the force, still heavily reliant on conscription and outdated strategies.

But even these elite units are not immune to fundamental challenges. The legacy of Soviet military structure hampers efficiency, and recent military ventures have been marked by undermanned units hastily cobbled together from across Russia.

On the ground, Russia’s military machine has shown signs of wear. The reported loss of 2,200 out of 3,100 tanks at the war’s outset, the adoption of older T-62s, and the abandonment of advanced T-14 Armata tanks due to soaring costs point to a deeper malaise.

In the skies, the failure to exercise air superiority in the early stages of the conflict has been a stark miscalculation. And at sea, Ukraine’s inventive maritime strike strategy has inflicted heavy losses on Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, diminishing its once-dreaded naval strength.

But it is Ukraine’s adept use of deception that has especially confounded the Russian military. Drawing inspiration from the ancient wisdom of Sun Tzu, Ukraine has outmaneuvered Russia with feints and diversions that would have impressed the architects of Operation Bodyguard in WWII or General Norman Schwarzkopf in the Gulf War.

The Kherson ruse, where Ukrainian forces simulated a major assault in the south while striking in the northeast, stands out as a masterclass in strategic misdirection.

This operation, underpinned by intelligence from the West, showcased Ukraine’s growing proficiency and the fragile nature of Russian supremacy.

What makes Russian troops particularly susceptible to Ukrainian ruses is not mere gullibility but structural issues within the Russian military—confirmation bias, discouragement of failure reporting, and over-compartmentalization.

These flaws, which previously went unnoticed against weaker adversaries, have been laid bare by Ukraine’s ingenuity.

While Russia’s military reforms since 2008 have led to a marked improvement in capabilities and training, the reality remains that Russian forces are a shadow of their boasted potential.

Economic strains further tighten the constraints on Russia’s grand military ambitions. With sanctions biting and resources stretched, the capability to sustain, let alone enhance, military operations is in jeopardy.

Relevant articles:
– How Much Firepower Does Russia Have Left After Two Years of War?, newsweek.com
– Russia’s Deceptively Weak Military, The National Interest
– The Kherson Ruse: Ukraine and the Art of Military Deception, Modern War Institute –
– Russia’s military is easy to fool, but that makes dealing with Moscow even riskier, researchers say, Business Insider