In the complex and highly strategic game of modern naval warfare, U.S. Navy’s Los Angeles-class submarines have been the submerged knights in America’s arsenal.
As the Indo-Pacific region becomes a focal point of conflict, these stealthy, lethal giants navigate the undersea battlefields, underscoring their value in maintaining underwater superiority.
The Backbone of US Naval Power The U.S. Navy, brandishing the largest submarine fleet globally, faces a formidable challenge in China’s rapid maritime expansion.
Amidst this, the Los Angeles-class submarines, carrying Tomahawk cruise missiles and Mark 48 torpedoes, remain indispensable in sinking enemy shipping and establishing naval dominance. Even as the newer Virginia-class subs inch closer to full service, the question lingers: can the U.S. afford to lose the Los Angeles-class before its successors are battle-ready?
These vessels, equipped to carry twelve Vertical Launch System (VLS) tubes and built by powerhouses like Newport News Shipbuilding Co. and General Dynamics Electric Boat Division, are not just numerous but embody quality, a testament to their enduring importance in U.S. naval strategy.
Retirement Risks and Strategic Blunders As the U.S. Navy progressively commissions the Virginia-class submarines, the retirement of the Los Angeles-class sparks intense debate.
Are we retiring these workhorses too soon? The USS Los Angeles (SSN-668), the pioneer of this venerable class, has been an exemplar since 1976, showcasing America’s undersea might.
But the premature retirement of some Los Angeles-class vessels raises eyebrows. Consider USS Baltimore (SSN-704), serving less than 16 years before being sidelined, and others, decommissioned halfway through their lifecycle.
“We are currently forecast to sustain a force of 50 SSNs throughout this decade,” explained Rear Adm. Doug Perry, stressing the importance of these subs in reaching the Navy’s future requirements of 66 to 72 SSNs.
A Reassessment of Priorities As the geopolitical chessboard gets more complex, the decision to phase out these submarines is controversial.
They play a vital role in strategic deterrence and combat readiness, given the rise of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities by adversaries.
“To pay for the new submarines, the Navy is retiring the Los Angeles-class submarines. But this is a major mistake,” an article emphasizes, cautioning against a potential window of vulnerability.
The Maintenance Conundrum and Forward Planning Recent years have seen the Navy pouring billions into the upkeep of aging Los Angeles-class subs, but with questionable returns. Subs like the USS Helena (SSN 725) become the poster children for confused decisions, with billion-dollar refits extending well beyond their due decommissioning.
Critics argue that it may be wiser to channel these funds into supporting mission-capable Virginia-class subs and boosting maintenance infrastructure.
Submarines and Geopolitical Chess Ultimately, the Los Angeles-class subs are akin to seasoned chess pieces in America’s naval game, their retirement and maintenance sparking debate among military strategists and policymakers.